Mike Caulfield
-
Use of MOOC Community Features in Blended Scenarios, Dan Ariely Edition
As readers of this blog know, Amy Collier and I have been making a year-long argument that MOOC community features, as currently designed, are often perceived by blended students as low-to-no-value substitutes for local interaction. That made this snippet of MOOC-runner Dan Ariely talking about his own class’s use of the MOOC rather interesting: Dan… Continue reading
-
Can People Designing Multiple Choice Tests for MOOCs Please Study Designing Multiple Choice Tests?
David Kernohan has a post up titled How I got a “first” on a FutureLearn MOOC with one weird old trick… over at FOTA, and it does just what it says on the tin. In the post, David details how he was able to get an 87.4% on a FutureLearn test for a course module without studying… Continue reading
-
Why the Why Matters
A quick follow-up to yesterday’s post on the supposed “death of theory” and its relation to MOOC research — the story thus far is that a number of people sincerely think the “why” doesn’t matter if our sample is big enough and the variables tracked are numerous enough. Here’s a typical quote from Thrun: One… Continue reading
-
Stocks, Flows, and the 80% Non-traditional Figure
At the MOOC Research Initiative conference Jeff Selingo gave what I thought was a capable presentation of the current landscape of higher education. People might quibble with a point or two, but overall it was a relatively balanced, hysteria-free overview of a market which is not necessarily “broken”, but is poised to undergo some relatively… Continue reading
-
MRI 13
I’ve just finished attending the MOOC Research Initiative conference and workshop, which felt not so much a conference on MOOCs to me as the beginning of something else. We kick Courdacity-style MOOCs around a lot, but if all MOOCs did was bring this level of intelligence and insight into problems of online learning, it would… Continue reading
-
Counting History PhD Employment
I used to do more statistical literacy stuff on this blog, and I’m toying with the idea of going back to that. The problem is that the stuff that really tends to matter is stuff everybody thinks they already know, but which most people have not built habits around. It’s not really fascinating stuff to… Continue reading
-
“Experimented On”
This “experimented on” phrase bothers me a bit: The SJSU affair falls somewhere between educational research and a social experiment, and we are very much in need of better experiments in these areas. Most educational research is pretty abysmal. Most social policy goes untested. The lack of decently designed experiments in these areas generally allows… Continue reading
-
Thrun Enters Burgeoning Sieve Market
I can’t read much of the recent piece of Thrun hagiography without wanting to do bodily harm to myself, so this following analysis might miss some of the subtlety of the article. I’ve tried to push myself to read it fully, and I really just can’t. From the photo up top of Thrun in what… Continue reading
-
Educational Technology and the Sources of Innovation
Cross-posted from e-Literate. After reading an an excellent post by tech-blogger Jon Udell on innovation, I spent the weekend getting reacquainted with work of Eric von Hippel, the researcher who pioneered the study of user-driven innovation. What’s interesting about von Hippel is that his research hits on the common themes of the open education movement,… Continue reading
-
That “Flipped Classrooms May Not Work” Story
This USA Today article is unfortunately par for the course in educational journalism today. Phil Hill already has an excellent take on this story, but let me add my two cents. It details the preliminary “impressions” of professors engaged in a three year study that will end in 2016. Despite having run flipped classes, they… Continue reading