Cleanup Time

Today’s photo investigation.

cleaning up.jpg

The big “story” now is that the Women’s March left a big mess and that’s awful, and they should have cleaned it up. Here’s the image — it’s shocking!

Well, this is almost too easy. There’s two ways to do this. If you search Snopes for the term “Women’s March signs snopes” you’ll find an article that debunks the right-hand photo, at least partially:

snopes

What the Snopes article says about that righthand photo is it is signs left by the Women’s March, but these particular signs were left at the Trump International Hotel in D.C. as part of the protest. That’s why they are clustered together like that. Someone does have to clean them up, but it wasn’t routine littering. Additionally, the Parks Service has remarked the protest was tidier than previous events. While the Snopes article gives no single word ruling, their presentation is close to what they usually call “Mixed” — partially true, but misleading in presentation.

Speaking of cleaning up, what about the photo on the left-hand side:

cleaning-up

Well, you see that “alamy” watermark by the guy’s waist? I’m guessing this is stock photography. And stock photography, in general, is not released after the day of an event, so I’m thinking this was taken long ago.

We’d like to right-click the photo and search by image, but my guess is that the two images pushed together won’t match anything. So let’s use the snipping tool.

Windows: Call up the “snipping tool“:

snip

Use it to capture the piece of the photo you want to search for. Save it to somewhere you’ll remember:

capture

Mac: Hold the “Command, Shift and 4” together and then select what you want to do a screen shot of. Save it to somewhere you’ll remember.

Now go to Google search and upload it, the way we’ve done with past photos.

mess

Any of these results is probably good to click on, but I pick door number three, partially because it is so specific.

And when we do that, we have good luck. We get to the stock photo purchase page, where there is a full description:

foto

We even get the date and location. It was shot seven years ago. So no, this was not from the march.

details

And… we’re done. Fake-a-rooni.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Cleanup Time

  1. To be fair (and setting aside whether one agrees with the purpose) the fact that the right-side photo is the result of intentional rather than careless littering could be seen as supporting the intended point even more strongly. If course, for all we know those papers were cleaned up by a woman. But I don’t see how the right side is a fake.

    • Again, the result is mixed not “debunked” or “false”. The meme clearly suggests that the littering was due to a lack of empathy for those who had to clean it up and that it was pervasive. In fact, the “littering” was confined to a very small area that imposed costs intentionally on an organization owned by the person they were protesting. The mere fact that the littering was confined to a single block is enough to rate this mixed — and actually leans toward mostly false.

      After things are debunked people often say well, that may be true, but there’s still a horrible thing here. I do the same thing. For instance, the White House did NOT “scrub” LGBT pages from its site, but the new pages don’t mention them, and isn’t that the same thing? I get irritated. But if it is the same thing, or worse, then spread the true claim. Fact-checking isn’t meant to be an argument with your point — it’s an argument against methods and carelessness

      So the point is that if people want to spread the claim that women dumped signs in front of Trump Tower, and if it is true that they ended up being a burden on males there then that’s fine — I’m happy to see the truth spread. But that’s another claim I think.

  2. I agree with what you say in the comment. But I got a completely different impression from your post, since I don’t see the “mixed” conclusion stated there — rather, the last words are “fake a rooni”, which I understand as a colloquialism for “fake”, which I take to mean “false”.

    In any case, I love your blog and hope you will keep up these great posts!

    • Good point. The picture on the left is fake-a-rooni. If you click through to the Snopes link they’ll say the picture on the right is mixed. I realize I did not make clear in the article that was the finding of Snopes so I’ve updated the link to make clear Snopes’s ruling is Mixed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s