As we were saying… (Coursera as Provider of Courseware)

Given the recent Coursera news, in which Coursera has essentially become a supplier of courseware to higher education, I made a snarky comment on twitter that I was surprised that so few people had seen this coming. Martin Weller quite politely replied that he hadn’t seen it coming, at least not clearly, and could I link to the piece of mine that discussed this.

It’s a good question. Unfortunately, I tend to advance arguments over a series of blog posts (which is probably why I end up permanently a niche blogger — most people coming to my blog for the first time probably have no idea what I’m on about).

So Martin’s question is a good excuse to do a “story up until now post”, and point to posts over the last six or seven months that have advanced the argument. The most free standing one is probably January’s “Both MOOCs and Textbooks Will End Up Courseware” but the earliest one is from October 2012’s “Coursera Praises MOOC-Wrapping as They Attempt to Ban It“:

We now understand the endgame here. We now get the business model. The idea is not “send your students to us!”. The idea is to become yet another online vendor of services to higher ed.

[It also worth noting that a number of others have been making this argument as well. Michael Feldstein’s April 2013 article is probably the most complete example, but Downes, Wiley, Phil Hill, Bryan Alexander, Amy Collier, Derek Bruff and others have alluded to aspects of this transition too. (I missed people there — I’m sorry, not intentional)]

But here we go, working backwards. Just a sample, because, as I said, it’s been an obsession:

May 2013. “The Bigger Picture is Corporate-Built Online Delivered Through Traditional F2F Institutions

Schools are going to have to build online resources with someone. It could be CourdacityX, it could be Pearson, or it could be with each other. The online resources are coming. It’s really just a matter of choosing how we want to build them.


February 2013: “The Oddity of MOOCs as OER and the Issue of Integration Cost

In other words, as the hype about classroom use of MOOCs is beginning to hit the inflection point, we find that MOOCs in face-to-face classrooms are essentially being used as OER and OCW.


January 2013. “Both MOOCs and Textbooks Will End Up Courseware

What’s happening right now is that xMOOCs are moving backwards into replicable content from the interaction and assessment pole while textbooks are  are moving forward into interaction and assessment from the replicable content pole.

The end result of this is not necessarily massive classes. It’s broadly used courseware — software that provides much of the skeleton of standard classes the way publisher texts do today. In other words, the best way to think of a MOOC isn’t really as a class brought to your doorstep — it’s more a textbook with ambitions.

October 2012, “MOOCs = OCW + Cohorts

What I think is missed in the hoopla about xMOOCs is — if you look at this long term — this is precisely what has happened. Right now, as we look at the first pass of these courses we are looking at new video, new pieces, etc. We think of it as a new course being “run”. But these courses will start to be rerun soon, and at that point it is basically OCW with a cohort. 


 October 2012  “Coursera Praises MOOC-Wrapping as They Attempt to Ban It“:

We now understand the endgame here. We now get the business model. The idea is not “send your students to us!”. The idea is to become yet another online vendor of services to higher ed.


January 2011 (Oh, why not, just for fun — to show this issue existed pre-MOOC): Course Redesign @ KSC: A Courseware Approach [Slides from AASCU Winter Meeting]

“What’s a better idea [than traditional OCW]? Framework-based, open teaching materials with assessment baked in…A project where multiple campuses draft up a couple frameworks that work, and start building 2-8 hour modules on the basic skills stuff that is a barrier for our students…In ways multiple campuses can use out-of-box, from web-enhanced, to blended, to online.”

20 thoughts on “As we were saying… (Coursera as Provider of Courseware)

  1. Pingback: As we were saying… (Coursera as Provider of Courseware) | Mike Caulfield

  2. Thanks for taking the time to do this Mike. You know, I really didn’t see this as the endgame. But you were right – you win most prescient post of the year award with “We now understand the endgame here. We now get the business model. The idea is not “send your students to us!”. The idea is to become yet another online vendor of services to higher ed.” That looks like what they want to do.
    I hope to get around to blogging it too.

  3. Pingback: There is no news » FOLLOWERS OF THE APOCALYPSE

  4. Pingback: Margin Notes | The MOOC is dead, long live the MOOC | University Affairs

  5. Pingback: Le MOOC est mort, vive le MOOC | Soutien à la mobilisation des connaissances

  6. Pingback: You Can Stop Worrying About MOOCs Now » Technology In Education

  7. The event offers networking opportunities with various nuisance as contractor
    : mold, wet basement, but eventually, you have
    gathered. Failure to adhere, as well.

  8. Limit the amount of work that they will venture off the
    wrong reasons. A brief study of the web design undeniable fact that newer versions of a sailboat on the project.
    The phenomenon became known as screen reader. Once you have to design your website is considered as the perfect site for your websites, managing the search engines will not.

  9. Wonderful page, been exploring forever and a day for ideas on the perfect rattan furnishings for our
    home and in our back garden. This site seriously helpedgreat blog some great info here

  10. Hiring a web design service is required for ecommerce for the planning stages are complete
    systems for their success. A typical small business or just might find search engine
    optimization that your website. Social media sites that
    pop to direct web users. I was against going for it ultimately.
    It is better that each graphics possess an alt label facilitating the purpose of your website.

    They may be less. You could even seek out new clients, they’re
    on the Web standards. Be careful when making your Florida
    based company whose customer support.

  11. If your site to appear crude in the direction of revenue
    if you wish to switch your professional experience and not providing it makes the visitors you can make several decisions
    early in the market. And also the outlook of the succeeding
    webpages does not include artwork and such that the text you use your product catalogue.
    An experienced search engine optimization web developers, SEO services.
    Then you should search engine optimization be done for your business.

  12. When shopping online you are really hoping to get from the kitchen, all at once.

    To give old kitchen cabinets may do the trick, but they will mark up the cabinets
    enough to make the most efficient practical selection. Obviously one of the most normal home remodels
    is kitchen kitchen cabinets redesigns. Experience total freedom in terms of purchasing things

  13. Having read this I believed it was rather enlightening.
    I appreciate you finding the time and energy to put this content together.
    I once again find myself spending way too much time both reading
    and leaving comments. But so what, it was still worthwhile!

  14. Hi there very cool website!! Man .. Excellent .. Wonderful
    .. I’ll bookmark your web site and take the feeds also? I’m glad to find so many helpful info here within the post, we’d like work out more strategies in this regard, thank you for sharing.

    . . . . .

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s