…was the name of the presentation Jim Groom and I originally submitted to ELI 2011. It was going to investigate the tendency of “undirected and unregulated openness to exacerbate inequality both in and out of the classroom” and suggest that this tendency “undermined the social justice claims of openness”.
Jim’s remedy was going to be corporate regulation (and a rant on corporate skimming of open development), and my remedy was going to be a rethinking of the current approach to OER, which is overly focused on self-study materials — stuff which is great for people that are, frankly, already doing quite well.
(The proposal was rejected, and we got exiled to the Herman Miller room session we eventually did).
So I’m happy to find (via Downes) that Justin Reich has been looking into this and adding some data to the mix. And guess what? Openness is a privilege multiplier.
(To sum up Reich’s article, the world looks a lot like scenario #2)
This is not a small problem; it’s not a bug we can program out of the system with a single tweak. If openness is a privilege multiplier, we can no longer sprinkle openness magic dust on problems and expect them to go away — more openness means more inequality, more centralized power, and the perpetuation of a permanent underclass. If openness is a privilege multiplier it means that every open project has to design in solutions to that issue on day one, and assess the impact on equality on day one hundred and one.
I think this has particularly profound implications in the area of OER, but I’ll save that post for another day.
Pingback: Justin Reich Goes to Work for HarvardX | Hapgood
Pingback: Justin Reich Goes to Work for HarvardX | Mike Caulfield
Pingback: The Sieve Manufacture Continues at Udacity | Hapgood
With havin so much written content do you ever run into any problems of plagorism or copyright infringement?
My blog has a lot of exclusive content I’ve either written myself or outsourced but it appears
a lot of it is popping it up all over the internet without my permission. Do you know
any methods to help reduce content from being ripped off?
I’d certainly appreciate it.
I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought
this post was great. I don’t know who you are but definitely you’re going to a famous blogger if you
are not already 😉 Cheers!
What a data of un-ambiguity and preserveness of valuable know-how regarding unpredicted emotions.
LORE (n.) – Outdated English lar learning, what is taught, data,
science, doctrine, artwork of educating,” from Proto-Germanic laizo (Old Saxon lera, Previous Frisian lare, Middle Dutch lere, Dutch
leer, Previous High German lera, German Lehre instructing, precept, doctrine), from PIE leis- (1) observe,
furrow” (see be taught).
Pingback: Empower Teachers First | Hapgood
You ought to be a part of a contest for one of the most useful sites on the internet. I’m going to highly recommend this site!