Please discard from your pitch:

• Tom Friedman world-is-flatism
• Kurzweilian Singularities
• Prenskyan Digital Nativism
• Dot-commer “Marginal cost of zero” talk

And please replace it all with this simple observation by Tom Hoffman:

I don’t understand why “computers can make it easier to do the difficult, sophisticated things we’ve been trying to do for years” is a less appealing, or at least less used, argument than “New! Disruptive! Etc.”

(Feel free to suggest additions to the discard list).