Comparison of the Day: CFL vs. Incandescent Mercury Pollution

From EnergyStar.gov:

Lifecycle impact is an invaluable tool in making fair comparisons.  It’s easy, for example, to get hung up on the small amount of mercury in a CFL bulb, a percentage of which can escape into the environment if the bulb is crushed in a landfill.

But the biggest contributor to mercury pollution is coal-fired plants, which push gigantic amounts of mercury into the environment as part of their normal operations.

So how do we compare the mercury impact of the two different bulbs? We calculate how much mercury is produced via electricity over the lifetime of the bulb (here standardized to 8000 hrs. of use, since CFLs last longer). Then we add the mercury in the bulb itself to the lifetime use figure. It seems obvious, and it’s certainly a common way to do it — but it’s an incredibly powerful way to look at things compared to the alternatives.

About these ads


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 130 other followers